Doctaverse

Transtubular Potassium Gradient (TTKG): Reading Renal Potassium Handling — With Caveats

Using the TTKG to assess aldosterone-driven potassium secretion in hyper- and hypokalemia — the formula, the preconditions that make it valid, a worked example, and why nephrologists now question it.

Run it: Transtubular Potassium Gradient (TTKG).

What it is

The transtubular potassium gradient estimates the driving force for potassium secretion in the cortical collecting duct — a surrogate for aldosterone activity. It asks whether the kidney is responding appropriately to a given plasma potassium, helping separate renal from non-renal causes of dyskalemia.

Formula

$$ TTKG = \frac{U_K / P_K}{U_{osm} / P_{osm}} $$

where U and P are urine and plasma potassium (mEq/L) and osmolality (mOsm/kg). The urine osmolality term corrects for water reabsorbed distally, back-estimating the potassium concentration at the end of the cortical collecting duct.

When to use

Workup of hyperkalemia or unexplained hypokalemia, to gauge whether renal potassium handling is appropriate. Validity preconditions matter: the result is only interpretable when urine osmolality > plasma osmolality AND urine Na > 25 mEq/L (adequate distal sodium delivery). This tool flags the calculation as invalid when urine is not concentrated relative to plasma.

Interpretation

Worked example

Hyperkalemic child: urine K 40, plasma K 6.0, urine osm 600, plasma osm 300.

$$ TTKG = \frac{40/6.0}{600/300} = \frac{6.67}{2.0} = 3.3 $$

Urine osm (600) > plasma osm (300), so the gradient is interpretable. A TTKG of 3.3 during hyperkalemia is inappropriately low (expected >7) — pointing toward hypoaldosteronism; confirm with urine Na >25 and aldosterone/renin studies.

Pitfalls

Run it: Transtubular Potassium Gradient (TTKG)


Decision support for qualified clinicians only — verify against current primary guidelines and your clinical judgement.

Get the Doctaverse app

Use the calculators, diagnostic criteria and drug formulary at the bedside.

Google Play App Store Run the calculator

References

Last updated 2026-06-28.

More like this

Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC): Grading Eosinophilia from the CBC Differential

Deriving the absolute eosinophil count from WBC and the eosinophil percentage, the mild/moderate/severe 500-1500-5000 per microliter grading, the hypereosinophilia threshold, a worked example, and interpretation pitfalls.

Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC): Calculation, Grading, and Febrile Neutropenia

How to calculate the ANC from the WBC, neutrophils and bands, the CTCAE severity grades, and why fever with an ANC <500 is a treat-now emergency.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC): From WBC and Differential to Lymphopenia Grading

Deriving the absolute lymphocyte count from WBC and lymphocyte percentage, age-dependent ranges, the infant SCID caveat, a worked example and pitfalls.

AIR Score: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Stratification

The AIR score for suspected appendicitis — its seven weighted items, the 0–12 scale, low/indeterminate/high bands, and how it compares with Alvarado and PAS.