Doctaverse

Stool Osmotic Gap: Separating Osmotic from Secretory Diarrhoea

Stool osmotic gap = 290 − 2 × (stool Na + stool K). A gap >100 mOsm/kg suggests osmotic diarrhoea; <50 suggests secretory. Formula, cut-offs, a worked example, and the key pitfalls.

Run it: Stool Osmotic Gap.

What it is

The stool osmotic gap estimates how much of the stool’s osmolality is unaccounted for by its measured electrolytes. The logic: stool is iso-osmotic with plasma (~290 mOsm/kg), and its electrolyte-driven osmolality is the measured cations (Na + K) plus their accompanying anions — captured by doubling the cation sum. A large leftover gap means some other osmotically active, poorly absorbed solute (an unabsorbed sugar, a laxative) is driving water into the lumen — osmotic diarrhoea. A small gap means the diarrhoea is driven by electrolyte secretion itself — secretory diarrhoea.

The formula

Stool osmotic gap (mOsm/kg) = 290 − 2 × (stool Na + stool K)

290 is the assumed normal stool osmolality. If a measured stool osmolality is available, use it in place of 290 (and ideally measure it promptly — see pitfalls).

Interpreting the gap

When to use it

Use it in the work-up of chronic or unexplained watery diarrhoea, when separating an osmotic from a secretory mechanism will change the differential and the next tests. Send stool for electrolytes (Na, K) and, where possible, osmolality. The bedside complement is a fasting trial: osmotic diarrhoea improves, secretory does not.

Worked example

Chronic watery diarrhoea, stool Na 30 mmol/L, stool K 20 mmol/L: gap = 290 − 2 × (30 + 20) = 290 − 100 = 190 mOsm/kg → >100, osmotic — pursue malabsorption / unabsorbed solutes, expect improvement on fasting.

Contrast: stool Na 110 mmol/L, stool K 30 mmol/L: gap = 290 − 2 × (110 + 30) = 290 − 280 = 10 mOsm/kg → <50, secretory — pursue toxins, congenital chloride diarrhoea, secretagogues; it will persist when the child is NPO.

Pitfalls and caveats

Run it: Stool Osmotic Gap


Decision support for qualified clinicians only — verify against current primary guidelines and your clinical judgement.

Get the Doctaverse app

Use the calculators, diagnostic criteria and drug formulary at the bedside.

Google Play App Store Run the calculator

References

Last updated 2026-06-28.

More like this

Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC): Grading Eosinophilia from the CBC Differential

Deriving the absolute eosinophil count from WBC and the eosinophil percentage, the mild/moderate/severe 500-1500-5000 per microliter grading, the hypereosinophilia threshold, a worked example, and interpretation pitfalls.

Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC): Calculation, Grading, and Febrile Neutropenia

How to calculate the ANC from the WBC, neutrophils and bands, the CTCAE severity grades, and why fever with an ANC <500 is a treat-now emergency.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC): From WBC and Differential to Lymphopenia Grading

Deriving the absolute lymphocyte count from WBC and lymphocyte percentage, age-dependent ranges, the infant SCID caveat, a worked example and pitfalls.

AIR Score: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Stratification

The AIR score for suspected appendicitis — its seven weighted items, the 0–12 scale, low/indeterminate/high bands, and how it compares with Alvarado and PAS.