Doctaverse

Serum–Ascites Albumin Gradient (SAAG): Sorting Portal from Non-Portal Ascites

SAAG = serum albumin − ascitic albumin. A gradient ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension with ~97% accuracy; <1.1 points to a non-portal cause. Formula, cut-off, example, pitfalls.

Run it: Serum–Ascites Albumin Gradient (SAAG).

What it is

The Serum–Ascites Albumin Gradient (SAAG) classifies ascites by the mechanism producing it, rather than by the older exudate/transudate protein dichotomy. It rests on a physiological fact: in portal hypertension, the high hydrostatic pressure forces a relatively albumin-poor ultrafiltrate into the peritoneum, so the gap between serum and ascitic albumin is wide. When ascites arises from other processes (peritoneal disease, malignancy), albumin leaks more freely and the gap is narrow.

The formula

SAAG (g/dL) = serum albumin − ascitic fluid albumin

Both albumins must be from samples drawn the same day (ideally close together), because serum albumin shifts with the patient’s clinical state.

Interpreting the gradient

The cut-off is a clean binary at 1.1 g/dL (equivalently 11 g/L). The gradient tells you the mechanism, not the specific disease — it narrows the differential, it does not close it.

When to use it

Calculate SAAG on every new diagnostic paracentesis as the first step in working up ascites. It is the single most useful classifier and outperforms the transudate/exudate framework. Pair it with ascitic total protein (helps separate cardiac ascites, often high-SAAG but high-protein, from cirrhotic ascites) and a cell count (to screen for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis).

Worked example

A child with suspected cirrhosis: serum albumin 3.5 g/dL, ascitic albumin 0.8 g/dL. SAAG = 3.5 − 0.8 = 2.7 g/dL → ≥1.1, portal hypertension likely — consistent with cirrhosis.

Contrast: serum albumin 3.0 g/dL, ascitic albumin 2.4 g/dL. SAAG = 0.6 g/dL → <1.1, pointing to a non-portal cause such as TB peritonitis or malignancy, which should redirect the work-up (adenosine deaminase, cytology, imaging).

Pitfalls and caveats

Run it: Serum–Ascites Albumin Gradient (SAAG)


Decision support for qualified clinicians only — verify against current primary guidelines and your clinical judgement.

Get the Doctaverse app

Use the calculators, diagnostic criteria and drug formulary at the bedside.

Google Play App Store Run the calculator

References

Last updated 2026-06-28.

More like this

Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC): Grading Eosinophilia from the CBC Differential

Deriving the absolute eosinophil count from WBC and the eosinophil percentage, the mild/moderate/severe 500-1500-5000 per microliter grading, the hypereosinophilia threshold, a worked example, and interpretation pitfalls.

Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC): Calculation, Grading, and Febrile Neutropenia

How to calculate the ANC from the WBC, neutrophils and bands, the CTCAE severity grades, and why fever with an ANC <500 is a treat-now emergency.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC): From WBC and Differential to Lymphopenia Grading

Deriving the absolute lymphocyte count from WBC and lymphocyte percentage, age-dependent ranges, the infant SCID caveat, a worked example and pitfalls.

AIR Score: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Stratification

The AIR score for suspected appendicitis — its seven weighted items, the 0–12 scale, low/indeterminate/high bands, and how it compares with Alvarado and PAS.