Doctaverse

Oxygenation Index (OI): The Primary PARDS Severity Metric Under PALICC-2

The Oxygenation Index — its formula, the PALICC-2 mild/moderate/severe bands, why children use OI not the Berlin P/F ratio, and a worked example.

Run it: Oxygenation Index.

What it is

The Oxygenation Index (OI) quantifies how much ventilator support is being spent to achieve a given arterial oxygen level. Because it incorporates mean airway pressure, it captures the cost of oxygenation — unlike a bare PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio. Under PALICC-2, OI (or its non-invasive cousin OSI, the Oxygen Saturation Index) is the primary metric for defining and stratifying pediatric ARDS (PARDS) in children on invasive mechanical ventilation, with PaO₂ used preferentially when an arterial line is available.

The method

OI = (FiO₂ × mean airway pressure) / PaO₂

FiO₂ as a percentage, mean airway pressure in cmH₂O, PaO₂ in mmHg. Higher OI = worse disease. The runner accepts PaO₂ in kPa and converts internally (×7.501).

PALICC-2 severity bands (invasive ventilation)

PALICC-2 advises optimising oxygenation to a target SpO₂ of 88–97% before computing the index, and stratifying severity at least 4 hours after the initial diagnosis rather than on the first gas.

Why children use OI, not the adult Berlin P/F

The adult Berlin definition grades ARDS on PaO₂/FiO₂ at PEEP ≥5. PALICC-2 deliberately moved pediatric stratification to OI/OSI because they reflect the applied airway pressure and perform better across the wide range of pediatric ventilation. Reserve the P/F ratio for the non-invasive/contextual situation; for an intubated child with an arterial line, OI is the metric of record.

Worked example

FiO₂ 60%, mean airway pressure 14 cmH₂O, PaO₂ 70 mmHg → OI = (60 × 14) / 70 = 12.0 → moderate PARDS. If, four hours later, the same child needs FiO₂ 80% and MAP 18 to hold a PaO₂ of 65, the OI climbs to (80 × 18) / 65 = 22.2 — now severe, and a clear signal that lung-protective strategy and adjuncts deserve escalation. Combine the absolute value with its trend and the broader clinical picture before acting.

Pitfalls and caveats

Run it: Oxygenation Index


Decision support for qualified clinicians only — verify against current primary guidelines and your clinical judgement.

Get the Doctaverse app

Use the calculators, diagnostic criteria and drug formulary at the bedside.

Google Play App Store Run the calculator

References

Last updated 2026-06-28.

More like this

Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC): Grading Eosinophilia from the CBC Differential

Deriving the absolute eosinophil count from WBC and the eosinophil percentage, the mild/moderate/severe 500-1500-5000 per microliter grading, the hypereosinophilia threshold, a worked example, and interpretation pitfalls.

Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC): Calculation, Grading, and Febrile Neutropenia

How to calculate the ANC from the WBC, neutrophils and bands, the CTCAE severity grades, and why fever with an ANC <500 is a treat-now emergency.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC): From WBC and Differential to Lymphopenia Grading

Deriving the absolute lymphocyte count from WBC and lymphocyte percentage, age-dependent ranges, the infant SCID caveat, a worked example and pitfalls.

AIR Score: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Stratification

The AIR score for suspected appendicitis — its seven weighted items, the 0–12 scale, low/indeterminate/high bands, and how it compares with Alvarado and PAS.