Doctaverse

Corrected Sodium for Hyperglycaemia: 1.6 vs 2.4 in DKA

How to correct measured serum sodium for hyperglycaemia in diabetic ketoacidosis, when to use the 1.6 versus 2.4 factor, and how it differs from pseudohyponatraemia.

Run it: Sodium Correction for Hyperglycaemia.

What it is

Hyperglycaemia osmotically draws water from cells into plasma, diluting sodium and producing a dilutional (translocational) hyponatraemia. The corrected sodium estimates what the serum sodium would be at a normal glucose, so you can track true sodium status as glucose falls during DKA treatment. This is a real osmotic shift — distinct from pseudohyponatraemia.

The formula

For each 100 mg/dL of glucose above 100 mg/dL, add a correction factor to the measured sodium:

Corrected Na = measured Na + factor × [(glucose − 100) / 100]

FactorOriginBest for
1.6Katz (1973), theoreticalGlucose up to ~400 mg/dL
2.4Hillier (1999), experimentalGlucose >400 mg/dL

Worked example — Na 130 mEq/L, glucose 600 mg/dL:

A “low” measured sodium of 130 is actually normal-to-high once corrected — so the patient is not truly hyponatraemic.

Why the corrected sodium matters in DKA

1.6 vs 2.4 — which to use

The relationship is non-linear: at very high glucose (>400 mg/dL) the dilution effect is greater, so the 2.4 factor fits better at extremes; 1.6 is the historical default and reasonable in milder hyperglycaemia. The calculator reports both. The clinically important point is the trend, not the single value.

Pseudohyponatraemia — do not confuse it

MechanismMeasured osmolality
Hyperglycaemic (true dilutional)Osmotic water shift into plasmaHigh
PseudohyponatraemiaLab artefact from severe hyperlipidaemia/hyperproteinaemia displacing plasma water (indirect ISE)Normal

Pseudohyponatraemia is a measurement artefact with normal serum osmolality and needs no correction factor — direct ion-selective electrode or blood-gas sodium avoids it. The hyperglycaemic correction above is for a real osmotic shift.

Run it now: Corrected Sodium Calculator


Decision support for qualified clinicians only — verify against current primary guidelines and your clinical judgement.

Get the Doctaverse app

Use the calculators, diagnostic criteria and drug formulary at the bedside.

Google Play App Store Run the calculator

References

Last updated 2026-06-28.

More like this

Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC): Grading Eosinophilia from the CBC Differential

Deriving the absolute eosinophil count from WBC and the eosinophil percentage, the mild/moderate/severe 500-1500-5000 per microliter grading, the hypereosinophilia threshold, a worked example, and interpretation pitfalls.

Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC): Calculation, Grading, and Febrile Neutropenia

How to calculate the ANC from the WBC, neutrophils and bands, the CTCAE severity grades, and why fever with an ANC <500 is a treat-now emergency.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC): From WBC and Differential to Lymphopenia Grading

Deriving the absolute lymphocyte count from WBC and lymphocyte percentage, age-dependent ranges, the infant SCID caveat, a worked example and pitfalls.

AIR Score: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Stratification

The AIR score for suspected appendicitis — its seven weighted items, the 0–12 scale, low/indeterminate/high bands, and how it compares with Alvarado and PAS.