Doctaverse

Pediatric QTc: Bazett vs Fridericia, and When Bazett Misleads

How to correct the QT interval in children — Bazett vs Fridericia, the >460 ms paediatric threshold, false positives at high heart rates, and a worked example.

Run it: Corrected QT Interval (QTc).

What it is

The QT interval shortens as heart rate rises, so a raw QT cannot be compared against a fixed threshold. A corrected QT (QTc) normalises the measured QT to a heart rate of 60 bpm, letting you screen for long-QT syndrome (LQTS) and drug-induced repolarisation delay. In children — who run faster baseline heart rates than adults — the choice of correction formula materially changes the answer.

The formulas

Both use QT and the RR interval (in seconds; RR = 60 ÷ heart rate):

$$ QTc_{Bazett} = \frac{QT}{\sqrt{RR}} \qquad QTc_{Fridericia} = \frac{QT}{\sqrt[3]{RR}} $$

Bazett applies a square-root correction; Fridericia a cube-root. At a heart rate of exactly 60 (RR = 1 s) the two agree. Away from 60 they diverge — and the divergence is the whole point.

When to use it

Use a QTc on any child with syncope, a family history of sudden death or LQTS, before and during QT-prolonging drugs (macrolides, ondansetron, antipsychotics, methadone), in electrolyte disturbance, and in poisoning. Measure QT in lead II or V5 over 3–5 beats; avoid measuring during sinus arrhythmia swings.

Worked example

QT = 0.40 s, heart rate 100 bpm, so RR = 0.60 s.

$$ QTc_{Bazett} = \frac{0.40}{\sqrt{0.60}} = 0.516\ s\ (516\ ms) $$

$$ QTc_{Fridericia} = \frac{0.40}{\sqrt[3]{0.60}} = 0.474\ s\ (474\ ms) $$

Bazett flags a markedly prolonged QTc; Fridericia is only borderline. The 42 ms gap is entirely an artefact of the faster heart rate.

Pitfalls and caveats

Run it: Pediatric QTc Calculator


Decision support for qualified clinicians only — verify against current primary guidelines and your clinical judgement.

Get the Doctaverse app

Use the calculators, diagnostic criteria and drug formulary at the bedside.

Google Play App Store Run the calculator

References

Last updated 2026-06-28.

More like this

Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC): Grading Eosinophilia from the CBC Differential

Deriving the absolute eosinophil count from WBC and the eosinophil percentage, the mild/moderate/severe 500-1500-5000 per microliter grading, the hypereosinophilia threshold, a worked example, and interpretation pitfalls.

Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC): Calculation, Grading, and Febrile Neutropenia

How to calculate the ANC from the WBC, neutrophils and bands, the CTCAE severity grades, and why fever with an ANC <500 is a treat-now emergency.

Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC): From WBC and Differential to Lymphopenia Grading

Deriving the absolute lymphocyte count from WBC and lymphocyte percentage, age-dependent ranges, the infant SCID caveat, a worked example and pitfalls.

AIR Score: Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Stratification

The AIR score for suspected appendicitis — its seven weighted items, the 0–12 scale, low/indeterminate/high bands, and how it compares with Alvarado and PAS.